https://www.cbsnews.com/news/deepseek-ai-raises-national-security-concerns-trump/
在这篇报道中提到了几个问题：
Security threat for users
While the calls from Moolenaar could be the first inkling of a possible congressional crackdown, Ross Burley — a co-founder of the nonprofit Centre for Information Resilience — warned that DeepSeek's emergence in the U.S. raises data security and privacy issues for users. Chinese law grants Beijing broad authority to access data from companies based in China.
"More and more people will use it, and that will open the door to more and more personal data just being given away to the [Chinese Communist Party] and being sent basically to mainland China to be able to inform them of their activities," Burley told CBS News.
"What they'll use it for is behavior change campaigns, disinformation campaigns, for really targeted messaging as to what Western audiences like, what they do," he added.
DeepSeek, which is based in the Chinese city of Hangzhou, notes in its privacy policy that the personal information it collects from users is held "on secure servers located in the People's Republic of China."
Under that policy, the company says it collects information including users' "device model, operating system, keystroke patterns or rhythms, IP address, and system language." DeepSeek also collects "service-related, diagnostic, and performance information, including crash reports and performance logs," according to the company.
对用户的安全威胁
虽然莫勒纳尔的呼吁可能是国会可能采取严厉措施的初步迹象，但非营利性信息复原中心的联合创始人罗斯·伯利 (Ross Burley) 警告称，DeepSeek 在美国的出现会给用户带来数据安全和隐私问题。中国法律赋予北京广泛的权力，可以访问中国公司的数据。
伯利对哥伦比亚广播公司新闻台 (CBS News) 表示：“越来越多的人会使用它，这将导致越来越多的个人数据被提供给（中国共产党），并被发送到中国大陆，以便告知其活动。”
他补充道：“他们会利用这些来开展行为改变运动和虚假宣传运动，以真正有针对性地传达西方观众的喜好和行为。”
总部位于中国杭州的 DeepSeek 在其隐私政策中指出，其从用户那里收集的个人信息“保存在位于中华人民共和国的安全服务器上”。
根据该 政策，该公司表示，它收集的信息包括用户的“设备型号、操作系统、按键模式或节奏、IP 地址和系统语言”。DeepSeek 还收集“与服务相关的、诊断的和性能的信息，包括崩溃报告和性能日志”。
这里就提到了从大语言模型诞生以来一直比较被关注的一个问题，就是国界之间的AI信息安全，其实用常理来推断，deepseek的网页端服务在美国不会有多少用户的，美国人已经用了好几年的chatgpt和calude，已经对这两家的服务产生了依赖，再加上他们对隐私的看重，或许国外大多数人都只是看看尝尝鲜，只有搞技术的会把模型down下来，自己部署。没人用的情况下，能泄露多少隐私给中国呢。
另外一个就是审查制度，哪里的大语言模型都会有审查制度，审查力度轻重罢了，而且美国人明知道我们国家互联网审查制度就是这样的，而且一直是这样的，还要在deepseek火起来之后把这个问题拿出来翻炒，想知道被审查的信息可以去wikipedia啊。